TWU: Prop G illegal, so suspend federal $
The Transport Workers Union has submitted a letter to the Department of Labor demanding that federal funding for SFMTA projects be suspended, based on the claim that Proposition G illegally requires an arbitrator to prioritize “the public interest in efficient and reliable transit.”
This is clearly a negotiating tactic, but it could lead the feds to suspend over $4 billion in capital funding for Central Subway and major maintenance projects.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know
[…] Prop G, the arbitrator must consider the impact of any decisions on the quality of service – a provision the union has bitterly fought. In addition to cost savings, the proposed contract contained provisions that should help service, […]